Now I did have certain ideas that I felt had been proven productive over time. Philosophies that I practiced at every stop. One of those was a pricing philosophy driven by competition and managed by gross margin need. The bottom line fact is that for the most part retails are market driven. This is especially true for retailers playing in that very broad middle ground defined as trying to be everything to everyone. Even those that play at either the high or low end in market pricing make pricing decisions based on what they see in the marketplace. This I suppose is a good thing, because our economy is after all market driven. However, as I now play the retail game from the other side of the desk, I am amazed at how many retailers pricing philosophy works, or better said, I wonder if they have a pricing philosophy at all.
Pricing of various commodities to obtain the proper mix, a mix that accounts for ad markdowns, shrink, and bill out need is as much an art as science. In determining prices for a given category, one has to know the following:
- What is the percent to total sales a given category, or item has on the entire department.
- What is the average shrink of this item? Will a lower retail return a higher sales number with lower shrink therefore produce more margin dollars than a retail that generates a high bill out, but higher shrink? (in other words, what is the retail price elasticity?)
- What categories float the margin boat and which categories drive sales and customer count, and how should each be priced?
- In a produce department, how should allied (dry, or processed branded packaged goods) be priced? What is their impact on the total?
- What about ad mix? Do you raise a regular retail to offset an ad mark down?
So, what to do? Well, If any of you out there show interest, I will give perspective to each of these in more detail in future posts.
But What do you think?